I attended this year’s California Library Association conference in Long Beach. The trip was definitely worth it:
- there was a lot to learn–not as much from session presenters as from other attendees from different libraries doing things similar to what I do at my library
- it was inspirational to see librarians at different points in their careers, from different libraries and different communities, all talking about the same problems and concerns and how they’re addressing them
The sessions I attended were very accessible (I didn’t attend any of the cataloging sessions. Some attendees said those were a little hard to follow). I’m thinking about proposing my own, maybe about computer classes. There weren’t any sessions about digital literacy instruction at public libraries, something I’ve worked on and thought about for years.
It was also nice to see that all but one of the sessions I attended didn’t rely at all on PowerPoint slides, and much of the feedback I read about other sessions appreciated how little the presenters relied on slides, instead encouraging audience discussion.
I made it to two of the three graduate school receptions but didn’t stick around either for very long. Everyone seemed to keep to their own groups. I think some time should have been set aside to encourage mingling between groups, or icebreaker games to introduce newcomers to the schools’ faculty and students.
Priveazy.com tracks these sites’ privacy settings and offers instructions for taking advantage of them.
Search results for mentions of a relatively old website called Priveazy.com are surprisingly low, and it’s such an appealing resource for patrons interested in maintaining all the privacy they can, so I thought I’d mention it here. Priveazy.com offers step by step instructions for adjusting the settings of the most popular social networking sites and email providers, mostly so that the least amount of your information is public, and to minimize your exposure to advertisers.
I’ve made it part of my computer classes, since I’d say half of those who show up already have Facebook and email accounts. The minutiae of instructions have been kept up to date so far (I’ve used the instructions for a handful of sites). The FAQ says they research new developments in the sites everyday (although the only member of “The Priveazy Team” is it’s founder and CEO). You’re not asked to create a free account for any of the instructions, which are jargon-free as far as I can tell, and instructional pictures seem well placed.
They also have an extension for the Google Chrome browser that’s supposed to make getting to and changing each site’s privacy settings a one-button affair. I don’t use Chrome, but the FAQ reads there are plans to support other browsers in the future.
So check it out and tell your patrons, especially the teens and parents who keep a close eye on their children’s online activity.
And while we’re at it, here’s news from lifehacker about opting out of Facebook’s “newest attempts to track everything you do, even offline” by cross referencing the email address and other info. Facebook collects with the info. on your rewards cards. So info. about the offline spending you do with rewards cards is tracked by one company, Datalogix, which has made a deal to share that info. with Facebook, which uses the data to help advertisers. The article has a link to the company’s site, which makes opting out pretty easy.
There’s a Facebook group called “Campaign to Rename Our Moon.” The group’s founder wants to change the name because “the moon” is kind of boring. A friend and I talked about the idea and I was arguing in support of it, really only half seriously, but I was trying to stress the importance of applying consistent naming rules, that are scalable, so that it makes sense to more people than only the people we know or could know (and to computers), and in situations we can’t conceive of. (The conversation ended with parallel universes.) Especially in text, the fact that the moon, a specific thing, shares the same word with what we could call everything else like it (other moons) really bugs me. At first I thought, we might not always have the context necessary to distinguish between “the moon” and the moon (of another planet).
It got me thinking about linked data, and the effort to include library catalogs, and how, in an environment in which things are more precisely identifiable because of its relativity to everything else, rather than in spite of it, we might not have to worry about the confusion our moon’s name might cause in a future we can’t see. On the Internet, linked data can provide that context all the time.
Of course, that future might not involve the Internet at all.
A library in Utah enlisted the arms and spirit of a human chain of 300 volunteers to move 50,000 books from an old building to a new one. Would your supervisors scoff at an idea like this?
I can’t help but think of barrels rolling down the stairs and an irate gorilla at the top level.